Skip to content

Risk Score

The Digital Risk Score rates an organization's external digital risk on a scale of 0 to 1000. Higher is worse: 0 is the lowest risk and 1000 the highest. Use it to see where your exposure stands, to track it over time, and to decide which remediation lowers it most.

StyxView calculates a score for your organization and for each third party you monitor, with the same method. It recalculates every score every four hours.

StyxView assigns each score to one of four risk bands. You cannot set the band yourself.

BandDigital Risk Score
Very High750 to 1000
High400 to 749
Medium200 to 399
Low0 to 199

To open the Risk Score page for your organization, select "Company Protection" and then "Risk Score" in the sidebar. For a third party, select "Third Party Risk", the third party, and then "Risk Score". You can also select the "Digital Risk Score" tile on the dashboard.

The page has four tabs:

TabWhat it shows
"Overview"The score, the categories and indicators driving it, and how it is calculated. Described below.
"Risk Score Card"Every risk indicator, grouped by category, with its grade. See Risk Score Card.
"Risk Indicator List"Every risk indicator with its findings, score contribution, and remediation status. See Risk Indicator List.
"Historic Risk Score"How the score changed between two scoring runs, and why. Described below.

Use "Select Date" to see the score on an earlier date. The first three tabs show the last scoring run of the day you select.

The "Overview" tab of the Risk Score page, with the "Digital Risk Score", "Risk Categories", and "Key Risk Indicators" cards.

The Risk Score page of a third party on the "Overview" tab, with the "Third Party Risk" menu open in the sidebar.

CardWhat it shows
"Digital Risk Score"The current score out of 1000, on a gauge coloured by band, and the "Industry Average Score": the average score of the organisations StyxView monitors in the same industry.
"Risk Categories"Each category's share of the current score, as a percentage. Select a category to open the Risk Indicator List filtered to it.
"Key Risk Indicators"The 12 indicators adding the most to the score. "Score Impact" is each indicator's points as a percentage of the score. Because each category is capped (see below), the percentages can add up to more than 100%. Select "View More" to open the Risk Indicator List.
"Findings"Each dot is one risk indicator, placed by its severity (rows) and its grade (columns, from A to F). Hover over a dot to see the indicator's name, category, subcategory, and description.
"Indicator Category Weights"The weight of each category. See Risk Score Categories and Weightages.
"Digital Risk Score Calculation"The score range of each risk band.
"Indicator Grading"The grade scale, from A (best) to F (worst).

For how indicators, grades, and weights combine into the score, see The Calculation.

The score is built from the findings of your Company Protection modules. Each module feeds one or more risk categories.

ModuleRisk categories it feeds
Attack Surface ManagementApplication Security, Asset Reputation, Certificates, Database and Directory Exposure, DNS Health, Network Security, and Patching Cadence
Brand ProtectionBrand Risks: lookalike domains, social media impersonation, rogue mobile apps, unauthorised job postings, and similar threats to your brand
Social & News MonitoringBrand Risks: negative news and social media sentiment
Data Leakage & Dark Web DetectionData Leakage: breached accounts, compromised payment cards, dark web mentions, and exposed cloud storage and code

The Brand Risks category also includes an Industry Risk indicator, which reflects the inherent cyber risk of your industry rather than your own findings.

Every risk indicator belongs to one of ten categories. Each category has a fixed weight, which is the most it can add to the score: a category weighted 20% can add at most 200 of the 1000 points. Once a category reaches that cap, more findings in it do not raise the score. The weights are the same for every organisation and third party.

CategoryWeightMaximum pointsWhat it covers
Network Security20%200Remote access services (FTP, SSH, and RDP) and insecure services (Telnet, SMB, VNC, and other risky ports) reachable from the internet, weak SSH protocols and ciphers, and exposed internal IP addresses.
Patching Cadence20%200Known vulnerabilities on your servers, by severity: Critical, High, Medium, and Low.
Asset Reputation10%100Your IP addresses and domains listed on abuse, exploit, malware, phishing, or spam blocklists.
Certificates10%100TLS/SSL certificate problems, such as expired, revoked, self-signed, or mismatched certificates, and servers that accept weak protocols or ciphers.
Data Leakage10%100Your data exposed outside your control: email addresses and domains in breaches, compromised payment cards, dark web mentions, data breaches, and exposed cloud storage or code repositories.
Database and Directory Exposure10%100Databases (such as MySQL, MongoDB, and Elasticsearch) and LDAP directory services reachable from the internet.
Application Security5%50Missing or weak HTTP security headers on your websites, such as Strict Transport Security and Content Security Policy.
Brand Risks5%50Misuse of your brand, negative news and social media sentiment, and the inherent risk of your industry.
DNS Health5%50Email authentication and DNS resilience: missing SPF, DKIM, or DMARC records, PTR record problems, and domains without a backup mail server or name server.
Disclosures5%50No risk indicators are assigned to this category at present, so it adds 0 points.
Total100%1000

The "Risk Score Card" tab of the Risk Score page shows every risk indicator in your Digital Risk Score, grouped by category and subcategory, with the grade each one has today. Use it to see which areas are graded worst and to open the findings behind an indicator. This page also explains how grades become the score.

The "Risk Score Card" tab, with the "Digital Risk Score", "Industry Average", "Indicators with Findings", and "Negative Sentiment" tiles above the category cards.

Four tiles at the top:

TileWhat it shows
"Digital Risk Score"The current score, out of 1000.
"Industry Average"The average score of the organisations StyxView monitors in your industry. For a third party, this tile is "Critical Vulnerabilities" instead: the number of critical vulnerabilities found on the third party's hosts. Select it to open them.
"Indicators with Findings"Indicators graded B to F, out of all the indicators in the score.
"Negative Sentiment"Social media posts and news articles about your organization with negative sentiment in the last 90 days. Select it to open them. For a third party, this tile is "Alerts" instead: the third party's alerts.

The "Risk Score Card" tab of a third party, with the "Digital Risk Score", "Critical Vulnerabilities", "Indicators with Findings", and "Alerts" tiles above a card for each risk category.

Below the tiles is one card for each risk category, with a section for each subcategory. Each row is one risk indicator:

  • A coloured dot shows the indicator's severity.
  • The info icon beside the name shows what the indicator measures.
  • The letter on the right is the indicator's grade, from A (best) to F (worst).

Select an indicator to open its findings in a new tab, where a findings page exists for it. The "Asset Reputation", "Network Security", and "Data Leakage" card titles also open their pages.

To show only some grades, choose them in "Indicator Grade". To see an earlier date, use "Select Date".

At the bottom of the tab, "How the Digital Risk Score is Calculated" shows four reference cards: "Indicator Category Weights", "Digital Risk Score Calculation", "Indicator Severity", and "Indicator Grading". The next sections explain them.

StyxView calculates the score in six steps, the same way for your organization and for every third party.

  1. Count the findings. For each risk indicator, StyxView counts its findings. Findings marked as false positives, and findings with the status Resolved, Closed Without Action, or No Longer Seen, are not counted.
  2. Grade the indicator. The count sets the indicator's grade, from A to F (see Risk Grade Interpretation).
  3. Turn the grade into points. Each indicator's points are its grade value, multiplied by its severity weight, multiplied by the maximum points of its category.
  4. Cap each category. The points of all indicators in a category are added up. If the total is above the category's maximum, the category counts only its maximum.
  5. Add the categories. The capped category totals add up to a score out of 1000.
  6. Adjust for size. If your organization has more than 250 active hosts, the score is multiplied by log(251) ÷ log(number of active hosts + 1) and rounded up. This stops a large attack surface from raising the score just because it is large. With 250 active hosts or fewer, the score is not adjusted.

The severity weights are fixed:

Indicator severityWeight
Critical100%
Very High75%
High50%
Medium30%
Low10%
Info0%

An Info indicator never adds points, however many findings it has. The "Indicator Severity" card shows Very High as "V. High".

The maximum points of each category are its weight, out of 1000: 200 for Network Security and Patching Cadence; 100 for Asset Reputation, Certificates, Data Leakage, and Database and Directory Exposure; and 50 for Application Security, Brand Risks, DNS Health, and Disclosures. See Risk Score Categories and Weightages.

An indicator's points are its "Score Contribution", shown on the Risk Indicator List:

Score Contribution = grade value × severity weight × category maximum

Two examples:

  • "Server Vulnerabilities (Critical)" has Very High severity (75%) and belongs to Patching Cadence (200 points). With one finding it is graded C (30%): 30% × 75% × 200 = 45 points. With four or more findings it is graded F (100%): 100% × 75% × 200 = 150 points.
  • "Strict Transport Security: Missing" has Medium severity (30%) and belongs to Application Security (50 points). Graded F: 100% × 30% × 50 = 15 points.

The category cap applies after this. If four Medium indicators in Application Security are each graded F, they add up to 60 points, but Application Security counts only its maximum of 50. Remediating findings in a category above its cap does not lower the score until the category total falls below the cap. The Risk Indicator List marks these indicators "At cap".

The size adjustment applies last. For example, a total of 600 for an organisation with 1000 active hosts becomes 600 × log(251) ÷ log(1001), rounded up: 480.

Grades apply to individual risk indicators. The overall score uses the four risk bands instead (see Risk Score Overview).

GradeGrade valueFindings for most indicatorsMeaning
A0%0No findings. The indicator adds no points.
B10%1Minor exposure.
C30%2Moderate exposure.
D50%3Elevated exposure.
E75%4High exposure.
F100%5 or moreThe worst grade. The indicator adds its full points.

The thresholds are set for each indicator and are the same for every organisation. Three indicators use different thresholds:

  • "Server Vulnerabilities (Critical)": 1 finding is C, 2 is D, 3 is E, and 4 or more is F.
  • "Client domain in a Third Party breach": 1 finding is E, and 2 or more is F.
  • "Industry Risk" is graded A to E from the risk rating of your industry, not from findings. It adds at most 25 points and cannot be remediated.

The "Risk Indicator List" tab of the Risk Score page lists every risk indicator in your Digital Risk Score, one row each, with the points it adds to the score. Use it to decide which findings to remediate first. For a third party, see Third Party Risk Indicator List.

The "Risk Indicator List" tab in the "By contribution" view, with the "Where to focus remediation" panel collapsed to its summary above the indicators.

ColumnWhat it shows
"Risk Category"The category the indicator belongs to, with a pill showing the points the whole category adds to your score, out of 1000. The pill is red when the category is at its cap. Hover over it for the category's weight, cap, and top contributors.
"Risk Subcategory"A group of related indicators within the category. A subcategory has no weight of its own.
"Risk Indicator"What is being measured, such as an expired certificate or an exposed database.
"Indicator Severity"Critical, Very High, High, Medium, Low, or Info. Severity sets how many points the indicator can add. Info indicators add none.
"Grade"From A (no findings) to F (worst), set by the indicator's number of findings.
"Total Findings"The findings counted for the indicator.
"Score Contribution"The points the indicator adds, out of 1000, before the category cap is applied. An asterisk (*) means the indicator's category is at its cap.
"Remediation"What remediating the indicator would do for your score. See Where to Focus Remediation.
"Scored"Hidden by default. "No" for Info indicators, which never add points.
"Observed"Hidden by default. "Yes" when the indicator is graded B to F, that is, when it has findings.

How grades and points are calculated is explained in The Calculation.

To work with the list:

  • Choose a view with the switch beside the tabs. "By contribution", the default, lists every indicator with the highest "Score Contribution" first. "By category" groups the indicators by category and subcategory and shows only those graded B to F.

    The "Risk Indicator List" tab in the "By category" view, with the indicators graded B to F grouped by category and subcategory.

  • Select a row to open the indicator's findings in a new tab, where a findings page exists for it.

  • Use "Columns" and "Filters" to show the hidden columns or narrow the list, and "Export" to download it. The export also includes each category's cap.

  • Use "Select Date" to see the list on an earlier date.

The "Where to focus remediation" panel above the list shows where remediation lowers your score now and where it does not. Collapsed, it shows how many quick wins you have and how many categories are at their cap. Select it to expand it:

  • "Quick wins" lists up to six indicators whose category is still below its cap, ranked by the points removed for each finding remediated.
  • "Categories at their cap" lists the categories already at or above their cap, with each category's weight and how far its points are over the cap.

The "Where to focus remediation" panel expanded, with its "Quick wins" and "Categories at their cap" lists.

A category adds at most its cap to the score, however many findings it has. Remediating findings in a category above its cap does not lower the score until the category's points fall below the cap.

The "Remediation" column gives each indicator one of four values:

ValueMeaning
"Quick win"The indicator adds points and its category is below its cap, so remediating its findings lowers the score at the next scoring run.
"At cap"The indicator adds points, but its category is at or above its cap, so remediating its findings has no immediate effect on the score.
"Static"The Industry Risk indicator. It reflects the inherent cyber risk of your industry and cannot be remediated.
"No action"The indicator is graded A or has no findings, so it adds no points.

These are the 109 risk indicators in the Digital Risk Score of your organization, grouped by category. "Severity" sets the most an indicator can add to the score: see Risk Indicators Score Contributions.

Risk CategoryRisk SubcategoryRisk IndicatorSeverityWhat it measures
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersStrict Transport Security: MissingMediumThe site sends no Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) header, so browsers can be downgraded to unencrypted HTTP.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersStrict Transport Security: Missing includeSubdomains directiveLowThe HSTS header does not cover subdomains, so they can still be reached over unencrypted HTTP.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersStrict Transport Security: Max-Age=0 presentLowThe HSTS header sets max-age=0, which turns HSTS off.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: MissingMediumThe site sends no Content Security Policy (CSP) header, which leaves it more exposed to cross-site scripting (XSS) and content injection.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Missing default-src directiveLowThe CSP has no default-src directive, so resource types without their own rule have no fallback restriction.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Missing object-src directiveLowThe CSP does not restrict plugin content with an object-src directive.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Missing script-src directiveLowThe CSP does not restrict where scripts load from with a script-src directive, which raises XSS risk.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Missing base-uri directiveLowThe CSP does not restrict the base URL with a base-uri directive, which can enable injection attacks.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Unsafe-inline directive presentLowThe CSP allows inline scripts (unsafe-inline), which weakens its XSS protection.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Unsafe-eval directive presentLowThe CSP allows dynamic code execution (unsafe-eval), which weakens its XSS protection.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Object-src '*' directive presentLowThe CSP allows plugin content from any source (object-src *).
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Script-src https://127.0.0.1 directive presentLowThe CSP allows scripts from localhost, a sign of development settings left in production.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Report-uri directive presentLowThe CSP includes a report-uri directive, which can mean violations are reported rather than blocked.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: 'Script-src http:' directive presentLowThe CSP allows scripts to load over unencrypted HTTP.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersX Content Type Options: MissingMediumThe site sends no X-Content-Type-Options header, so browsers may guess the type of a file (MIME sniffing).
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersX Content Type Options: Missing nosniff directiveLowThe X-Content-Type-Options header is not set to nosniff, so browsers may misread file types.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersX-Frame-Options: MissingMediumThe site sends no X-Frame-Options header, which leaves it open to clickjacking.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersX-Frame-Options: ALLOW-FROM directive presentLowX-Frame-Options uses the deprecated ALLOW-FROM value, which most browsers ignore.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersX XSS Protection: MissingMediumThe site sends no X-XSS-Protection header, so the browser applies no basic XSS filtering.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersX XSS Protection: Missing 1 and mode=blockLowThe X-XSS-Protection header is present but not set to 1; mode=block.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersReferrer Policy: MissingMediumThe site sends no Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs may be shared with other sites.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersReferrer Policy: Unsafe-url directive presentLowReferrer-Policy is set to unsafe-url, which sends the full URL with every request.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersReferrer Policy: Origin-when-cross-origin directive presentLowReferrer-Policy is set to origin-when-cross-origin, which still shares your origin with other sites.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersPermissions Policy: MissingMediumThe site sends no Permissions-Policy header to restrict browser features such as the camera and location.
Asset ReputationAbuse BlocklistAbuse BlocklistHighYour IP addresses or domains are listed on an abuse blocklist.
Asset ReputationExploit BlocklistExploit BlocklistCriticalYour IP addresses or domains are listed on an exploit blocklist, a sign of compromise or active targeting.
Asset ReputationMalware BlocklistMalware BlocklistCriticalYour IP addresses or domains are listed on a malware blocklist, a sign of infection or malware distribution.
Asset ReputationPhishing BlocklistPhishing BlocklistHighYour IP addresses or domains are listed on a phishing blocklist.
Asset ReputationSpam BlocklistSpam BlocklistMediumYour IP addresses or domains are listed on a spam blocklist, which can hurt email deliverability.
Brand RisksDomain SquattingLookalike DomainMediumDomains resembling yours that are confirmed as infringing your brand ("Infringement Detected").
Brand RisksDomain SquattingLookalike Domain (Unverified)LowDomains resembling yours that are not yet confirmed as infringing.
Brand RisksIndustry RiskIndustry RiskHighThe inherent cyber risk of your industry. Graded A to E from your industry's risk rating, it adds at most 25 points and cannot be remediated.
Brand RisksNegative Sentiment NewsNegative News SentimentLowNews articles about your organization with negative sentiment, posted in the last month.
Brand RisksNegative Sentiment SocialNegative Social SentimentLowSocial media posts about your organization with negative sentiment, posted in the last month.
Brand RisksPhishing and Evil-Twin WebsitePhishing and Evil-Twin Website (Unverified)InfoPossible phishing or evil-twin copies of your websites, not yet confirmed.
Brand RisksReverse Logo SearchReverse Logo Search (Unverified)InfoYour logo found on other websites, not yet confirmed as misuse.
Brand RisksRogue Mobile AppsRogue Mobile App (unverified)InfoMobile apps that may use your brand without authorisation, not yet confirmed.
Brand RisksScam Exposition WebsiteScam Exposition Website (Unverified)InfoMentions of your organization on scam-reporting websites, not yet confirmed.
Brand RisksSocial Media Account ImpersonationSocial Media ImpersonationMediumSocial media accounts confirmed as impersonating your organization or its people.
Brand RisksSocial Media Account ImpersonationSocial Media Impersonation (unverified)InfoPossible impersonating social media accounts, not yet confirmed.
Brand RisksUnauthorized Job PostingsUnauthorized Job Posting (unverified)InfoJob postings that may use your brand without authorisation, not yet confirmed.
Brand RisksWeb BeaconWeb Beacon (Unverified)InfoYour web beacon was detected on a page that is not on your allowlist.
Brand RisksWeb Referrer LogWeb Referrer Log (Unverified)InfoVisitors reached your site from a referring source that is not on your allowlist.
CertificatesCertificate IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate Has ExpiredVery HighA certificate on your hosts has expired.
CertificatesCertificate IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate is revokedHighThe issuing certificate authority has revoked the certificate.
CertificatesCertificate IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate is self-signedHighThe certificate is self-signed, so clients cannot verify it.
CertificatesCertificate IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate lifetime is longer than best practiceLowThe certificate is valid for longer than current best practice.
CertificatesCertificate IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate MismatchMediumThe certificate does not match the host name it protects.
CertificatesCertificate IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate without revocation mechanismLowThe certificate offers no way to check whether it has been revoked (OCSP or CRL).
CertificatesServer IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate weak cipherMediumThe server accepts weak encryption ciphers.
CertificatesServer IssuesWeak Protocol SSLv3 in UseCriticalThe server accepts SSLv3, which is vulnerable to the POODLE attack.
CertificatesServer IssuesWeak Protocol TLSv1.0 in UseMediumThe server accepts TLS 1.0, which is deprecated.
CertificatesServer IssuesWeak Protocol TLSv1.1 in UseLowThe server accepts TLS 1.1, which is deprecated. Use TLS 1.2 or later.
CertificatesServer IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate Incomplete certificate chainLowThe server does not send the full certificate chain, which can cause trust failures.
CertificatesServer IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate Expiring SoonLowA certificate is close to its expiry date.
CertificatesServer IssuesSSL/TLS Service Supports Very Weak ProtocolVery HighThe server accepts a severely outdated SSL or TLS protocol version.
Data LeakageAccountsClient email in a Third Party breachHighEmail addresses on your domains found in data breaches at other organisations.
Data LeakageAccountsClient domain in a Third Party breachCriticalYour domains found in data breaches at other organisations.
Data LeakageCredit CardCompromised Credit CardVery HighPayment cards matching your Bank Identification Numbers (BIN) found on dark web marketplaces.
Data LeakageDark WebDark Web MentionVery HighMentions of your organization on dark web forums, marketplaces, and channels.
Data LeakageData BreachData BreachCriticalEvidence that your organization's domains or systems were involved in a data breach.
Data LeakageInfrastructure ExposureExposed Cloud StorageCriticalPublicly accessible cloud storage, such as AWS S3, Azure Blob, or Google Cloud Storage buckets, linked to your organization.
Data LeakageInfrastructure ExposureExposed Code RepoInfoPublic code repositories that may expose your source code, credentials, or other sensitive data.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedApache Cassandra Service ObservedVery HighAn Apache Cassandra database reachable from the internet.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedApache CouchDB Service ObservedVery HighAn Apache CouchDB database reachable from the internet.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedDynamo Database ObservedVery HighAn Amazon DynamoDB database reachable from the internet.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedElasticsearch Service ObservedVery HighAn Elasticsearch cluster reachable from the internet.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedMongoDB Service ObservedVery HighA MongoDB database reachable from the internet.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedMS SQL Service ObservedVery HighA Microsoft SQL Server database reachable from the internet.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedMySQL Service ObservedVery HighA MySQL database reachable from the internet.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedNeo4j Database ObservedVery HighA Neo4j graph database reachable from the internet.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedOracle Database ObservedVery HighAn Oracle database reachable from the internet.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedPostgreSQL Service ObservedVery HighA PostgreSQL database reachable from the internet.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedRedis Service ObservedVery HighA Redis data store reachable from the internet.
Database and Directory ExposureDirectory ServicesLDAP Service ObservedVery HighAn LDAP directory service reachable from the internet.
DNS HealthDomain HealthDomain Without Backup Mail ServerMediumThe domain has no backup mail server, so mail delivery stops if its only mail server fails.
DNS HealthDomain HealthDomain Without Backup Name ServerMediumThe domain has no backup name server, so it stops resolving if its only name server fails.
DNS HealthEmail SecurityDKIM Record Not FoundInfoNo DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) record was found for the domain.
DNS HealthEmail SecurityDMARC Record Not FoundMediumThe domain publishes no Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) policy.
DNS HealthEmail SecurityMail Server PTR MismatchLowThe mail server's PTR (reverse DNS) record does not match its IP address, which can hurt deliverability.
DNS HealthEmail SecurityMail Server PTR Not ConfiguredLowThe mail server has no PTR (reverse DNS) record, which can hurt deliverability.
DNS HealthEmail SecuritySPF Record Not FoundVery HighThe domain publishes no Sender Policy Framework (SPF) record, so anyone can send mail that appears to come from it.
DNS HealthEmail SecuritySPF Record Contains WildcardLowThe SPF record contains a wildcard, which can authorise unintended senders.
DNS HealthEmail SecuritySPF Record contains a SoftfailLowThe SPF record ends in softfail (~all), so mail that fails the check is marked rather than rejected.
Network SecurityExposed Internal IP NetworkInternal IP Address/Range ExposedLowInternal (private) IP addresses or ranges are publicly visible, which reveals your network layout.
Network SecurityInsecure ProtocolsSSH Server Supports Vulnerable ProtocolHighThe SSH server accepts an outdated protocol version.
Network SecurityInsecure ProtocolsSSH Server Supports Weak CipherMediumThe SSH server accepts weak encryption ciphers.
Network SecurityInsecure ProtocolsSSH Server Supports Weak MAC AlgorithmMediumThe SSH server accepts weak message authentication code (MAC) algorithms.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceDNS Service Observed (53)InfoA DNS server reachable from the internet on port 53.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceIMAP Service Observed (143, 993)MediumAn IMAP mail service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceOpenVPN Service Observed (1194)MediumAn OpenVPN service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceOther Potentially Insecure PortsMediumOther open ports commonly associated with risk when reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServicePOP3 Service Observed (110, 995)MediumA POP3 mail service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServicePPTP Service Observed (1723)MediumA PPTP VPN service, which uses an insecure, deprecated protocol.
Network SecurityInsecure ServicePulse Connect Secure VPN Product Observed (6514)MediumA Pulse Connect Secure VPN gateway reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceRsync Service Observed (873)MediumAn rsync file synchronisation service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceSMB Service Observed (139, 445)MediumA Server Message Block (SMB) file-sharing service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceSOAP Server ObservedInfoA SOAP web service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceTelnet Service Observed (23)MediumA Telnet service, which sends credentials in plain text.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceUPnP Service (1900)LowA Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceVNC Service Observed (5800, 5900)MediumA Virtual Network Computing (VNC) remote desktop service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceVoIP Service Observed (5060)InfoA Voice over IP (VoIP) service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityRemote Access ServiceFTP Service Observed (21)HighAn FTP file transfer service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityRemote Access ServiceRDP Service Observed (3389)Very HighA Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityRemote Access ServiceSSH Service Observed (22)HighAn SSH service reachable from the internet.
Patching CadencePatching CadenceServer Vulnerabilities (Critical)Very HighKnown vulnerabilities rated Critical on your servers.
Patching CadencePatching CadenceServer Vulnerabilities (High)HighKnown vulnerabilities rated High on your servers.
Patching CadencePatching CadenceServer Vulnerabilities (Medium)MediumKnown vulnerabilities rated Medium on your servers.
Patching CadencePatching CadenceServer Vulnerabilities (Low)LowKnown vulnerabilities rated Low on your servers.
  1. What is the Digital Risk Score?
    A rating of an organization's external digital risk from 0 to 1000, where higher is worse. Scores fall into four bands: Low (0 to 199), Medium (200 to 399), High (400 to 749), and Very High (750 to 1000). See Risk Score Overview.

  2. How is the score calculated?
    Each risk indicator is graded A to F by its number of findings. The grade, the indicator's severity, and the weight of its category set the indicator's points. Each category is capped at its weight, the capped categories are added up to a score out of 1000, and the score is adjusted for organisations with more than 250 active hosts. See The Calculation.

  3. How often is the score updated?
    Every four hours. To see an earlier score, use "Select Date". To compare two scoring runs, use the Historic Risk Score tab.

  4. Which findings count toward the score?
    Every finding on a risk indicator, except findings marked as false positives and findings with the status Resolved, Closed Without Action, or No Longer Seen.

  5. What contributes most to my score?
    Network Security and Patching Cadence carry the most weight, at 200 points each. Within a category, indicators with Critical or Very High severity and a grade of F add the most. To see your own largest contributors, sort this list by "Score Contribution" or open "Key Risk Indicators" on the "Overview" tab.

  6. I remediated findings. Why has my score not dropped?
    There are three common reasons. The score changes only at the next scoring run, after the findings' status has changed. The indicator's grade may not have changed, because it is set by thresholds: an indicator with eight findings is still graded F after you remediate two. Or the indicator's category is above its cap, so its points must fall below the cap before the score moves. The "Remediation" column marks these indicators "At cap".

  7. Does the size of my organisation affect the score?
    Grades do not: an indicator's thresholds are the same for every organisation. The total score does: if your organization has more than 250 active hosts, the score is scaled down so that a large attack surface does not raise it just because it is large.

  8. How is a third party's score different?
    It is calculated the same way, with the same categories and weights. A third party's Risk Indicator List shows fewer indicators than your own. See Third Party Risk Indicator List.

  9. Where can I see the score?
    On the dashboard, and on the Risk Score page: select "Company Protection" and then "Risk Score" in the sidebar. For a third party, select "Third Party Risk", the third party, and then "Risk Score".

The "Risk Indicator List" breaks a third party's Digital Risk Score down into the individual signals, called risk indicators, that StyxView evaluates. For each indicator it shows how many findings there are, the grade they earn, and how many points they add to the score.

The "Risk Indicator List" tab for a third party, with categories, indicators, severity, grade, findings, and "Where to focus remediation".

To open it, select Third Party Risk → a third party → Risk Score, then the "Risk Indicator List" tab. You can also select "View More" under "Key Risk Indicators", or a category under "Risk Categories", on the third party's dashboard.

The list is for the date in "Select Date", which defaults to the latest score. Choose an earlier date to see the list as it was then.

ColumnWhat it shows
"Risk Category"The top-level risk area, with a pill showing the category's contribution to the score out of 1000. Each category is capped at its weight.
"Risk Subcategory"A group of related indicators within the category. It has no weight of its own.
"Risk Indicator"The name of the indicator, for example an expired certificate or an exposed service.
"Indicator Severity"How damaging the indicator is if triggered, from "Info" up to "Critical". Severity scales how much each finding moves the score.
"Grade"A grade from A (clean) to F (worst), set by comparing the number of findings with thresholds set for that indicator.
"Total Findings"The number of live findings for the indicator.
"Score Contribution"The points the indicator adds to the score, out of 1000. An asterisk means its category is already at its cap.
"Remediation"What remediating the indicator would do. See below.
"Scored"Whether the indicator counts toward the score. "No" means it is informational only ("Info" severity). Hidden by default.
"Observed"Whether the indicator is currently triggered, meaning its grade is worse than A. Hidden by default.

Hover over a category, subcategory, severity, grade, or contribution to see how it was worked out. Select a row to open the findings behind that indicator in a new tab.

RemediationMeaning
"Quick win"The indicator's category is below its cap, so remediating its findings lowers the score straight away.
"At cap"The category is already at its cap, so remediating findings here has no effect on the score until the category total drops below the cap.
"Static"The indicator reflects inherent industry risk. It counts toward the score but cannot be remediated.
"No action"There is nothing to remediate.

Above the table, "Where to focus remediation" lists the categories at their cap and the quick wins, ranked by how much score each finding remediated removes. Use the "By contribution" and "By category" buttons to sort the list by score contribution or group it by category.

Risk indicators are technical and contextual signals that measure an organisation's exposure to cyber threats. They come from:

  • Infrastructure configurations and exposed services.
  • Compromised assets and credentials.
  • Threat actor activity.
  • Brand and reputation signals.

StyxView collects these signals from the surface, deep, and dark web and from open-source and proprietary intelligence feeds. Together they make up the Digital Risk Score, which helps you prioritise remediation, follow trends, and judge a third party's security posture.

The table below lists the indicators StyxView evaluates for a third party. Indicators with "Info" severity are informational and do not count toward the score. For the indicators evaluated for your own organisation, see Risk Indicator List.

Risk CategoryRisk SubcategoryRisk IndicatorDescription
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: MissingThe site sends no Content-Security-Policy header, which leaves it more exposed to cross-site scripting (XSS) and content injection.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Missing base-uri directiveThe Content-Security-Policy has no base-uri directive, so the page's base URL can be changed to enable injection attacks.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Missing default-src directiveThe Content-Security-Policy has no default-src directive, so there is no fallback rule for loading resources.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Missing object-src directiveThe Content-Security-Policy has no object-src directive, so untrusted plugin content can load.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Missing script-src directiveThe Content-Security-Policy has no script-src directive, so script sources are not restricted, which raises XSS risk.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Object-src '*' directive presentThe Content-Security-Policy allows plugin content from any source.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Report-uri directive presentThe Content-Security-Policy includes a report-uri directive, which suggests violations may be logged rather than blocked.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: 'Script-src http:' directive presentThe Content-Security-Policy allows scripts to load over unencrypted HTTP.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Script-src https://127.0.0.1 directive presentThe Content-Security-Policy allows scripts from localhost, a sign of development or test settings left in production.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Unsafe-eval directive presentThe Content-Security-Policy allows unsafe-eval, so code can be run dynamically, which increases XSS exposure.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersContent Security Policy: Unsafe-inline directive presentThe Content-Security-Policy allows unsafe-inline, so inline scripts can run, which creates XSS risk.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersPermissions Policy: MissingThe site sends no Permissions-Policy header, so use of sensitive browser features is not restricted.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersReferrer Policy: MissingThe site sends no Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs may leak to other sites.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersReferrer Policy: Origin-when-cross-origin directive presentThe Referrer-Policy is origin-when-cross-origin, which limits referrer information but still reveals the site's origin.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersReferrer Policy: Unsafe-url directive presentThe Referrer-Policy is unsafe-url, which sends full URLs to every site.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersStrict Transport Security: Max-Age=0 presentThe Strict-Transport-Security header sets max-age=0, which turns it off and allows protocol downgrade attacks.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersStrict Transport Security: MissingThe site sends no Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) header, which exposes it to protocol downgrade and interception attacks.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersStrict Transport Security: Missing includeSubdomains directiveThe HSTS header has no includeSubDomains directive, so subdomains can still be reached over insecure connections.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersX Content Type Options: MissingThe site sends no X-Content-Type-Options header, so browsers may guess content types, which risks content-type confusion attacks.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersX Content Type Options: Missing nosniff directiveThe X-Content-Type-Options header lacks the nosniff value, so browsers may misread file types.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersX-Frame-Options: ALLOW-FROM directive presentThe X-Frame-Options header uses the deprecated ALLOW-FROM directive, which offers weak protection.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersX-Frame-Options: MissingThe site sends no X-Frame-Options header, which leaves it open to clickjacking.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersX XSS Protection: MissingThe site sends no X-XSS-Protection header, so the browser's basic XSS filtering is not turned on.
Application SecurityHTTP HeadersX XSS Protection: Missing 1 and mode=blockThe X-XSS-Protection header is set, but not to block mode, so reflected XSS attacks are not blocked.
Asset ReputationAbuse BlocklistAbuse BlocklistThe third party's assets appear on abuse blocklists, which can indicate compromise or malicious activity.
Asset ReputationExploit BlocklistExploit BlocklistThe third party's assets appear on exploit blocklists, which can mean they are actively targeted or exploitable.
Asset ReputationMalware BlocklistMalware BlocklistThe third party's assets appear on malware blocklists, which can indicate infection or links to malware distribution.
Asset ReputationPhishing BlocklistPhishing BlocklistThe third party's assets appear on phishing blocklists, which can indicate compromised systems used for phishing.
Asset ReputationSpam BlocklistSpam BlocklistThe third party's assets appear on spam blocklists, which can affect email delivery and indicate compromised mail systems.
Brand RisksDomain SquattingLookalike DomainRegistered domains that closely resemble the third party's domains and could be used for impersonation.
Brand RisksDomain SquattingLookalike Domain (Unverified)Possible lookalike domains that have not yet been verified as threats.
Brand RisksIndustry RiskIndustry RiskAn addition to the score for the inherent cyber and brand risk of the third party's industry. Some industries are targeted more than others.
Brand RisksPhishing and Evil-Twin WebsitePhishing and Evil-Twin Website (Unverified)Possible phishing or evil-twin websites imitating the third party that have not yet been verified.
Brand RisksReverse Logo SearchReverse Logo Search (Unverified)Uses of the third party's logo found on the surface web that have not yet been verified.
Brand RisksScam Exposition WebsiteScam Exposition Website (Unverified)Mentions of the third party's name in scam databases that have not yet been verified.
Brand RisksWeb BeaconWeb Beacon (Unverified)A web beacon detected on an unauthorised page, not yet verified.
Brand RisksWeb Referrer LogWeb Referrer Log (Unverified)Web traffic referred from an unauthorised source, not yet verified.
CertificatesCertificate IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate Has ExpiredAn expired TLS/SSL certificate, which can disrupt services and push users to insecure connections.
CertificatesCertificate IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate is revokedA certificate revoked by its certificate authority, which can indicate compromise or a policy violation.
CertificatesCertificate IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate is self-signedA self-signed certificate, which clients do not trust and which can make interception easier.
CertificatesCertificate IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate lifetime is longer than best practiceA certificate valid for longer than current good practice recommends.
CertificatesCertificate IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate MismatchA certificate that does not match the domain it protects, which points to a misconfiguration.
CertificatesCertificate IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate without revocation mechanismA certificate without a revocation check, such as OCSP or a certificate revocation list, so its revocation cannot be confirmed.
CertificatesServer IssuesSSL/TLS Service Supports Very Weak ProtocolA service that supports extremely outdated SSL/TLS protocols.
CertificatesServer IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate Expiring SoonA certificate close to expiry. Renewing it avoids disruption.
CertificatesServer IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate Incomplete certificate chainA certificate served without its full chain, which can cause trust failures.
CertificatesServer IssuesTLS/SSL Certificate weak cipherA certificate set up with weak encryption ciphers, which are open to cryptographic attacks.
CertificatesServer IssuesWeak Protocol SSLv3 in UseA service that still supports SSLv3, which is vulnerable to the POODLE attack.
CertificatesServer IssuesWeak Protocol TLSv1.0 in UseA service that supports TLS 1.0, a deprecated protocol without modern security features.
CertificatesServer IssuesWeak Protocol TLSv1.1 in UseA service that supports TLS 1.1, which is outdated. TLS 1.2 or later is recommended.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedApache Cassandra Service ObservedA Cassandra database reachable from the internet, which risks unauthorised access to its data.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedApache CouchDB Service ObservedA CouchDB database reachable from the internet, which risks unauthorised access to its data.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedDynamo Database ObservedA DynamoDB database reachable from the internet, which risks unauthorised access to its data.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedElasticsearch Service ObservedAn Elasticsearch cluster reachable from the internet, which risks unauthorised access to its data.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedMongoDB Service ObservedA MongoDB database reachable from the internet, which risks unauthorised access to its data.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedMS SQL Service ObservedA Microsoft SQL Server database reachable from the internet, which risks unauthorised access to its data.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedMySQL Service ObservedA MySQL database reachable from the internet, which risks unauthorised access to its data.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedNeo4j Database ObservedA Neo4j database reachable from the internet, which risks unauthorised access to its data.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedOracle Database ObservedA Oracle database reachable from the internet, which risks unauthorised access to its data.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedPostgreSQL Service ObservedA PostgreSQL database reachable from the internet, which risks unauthorised access to its data.
Database and Directory ExposureDatabase Server ExposedRedis Service ObservedA Redis instance reachable from the internet, which can expose cached data or serve as an entry point.
Data LeakageAccountsClient domain in a Third Party breachThe third party's domains found in breach data from other organisations.
Data LeakageAccountsClient email in a Third Party breachEmail addresses at the third party's domains found in breach data from other organisations.
Data LeakageDark WebDark Web MentionMentions of the third party on dark web forums, marketplaces, and channels, which can indicate threat actor interest.
DNS HealthDomain HealthDomain Without Backup Mail ServerA domain with no backup mail server, so email stops if the only one fails.
DNS HealthDomain HealthDomain Without Backup Name ServerA domain with no backup name server, so it can go offline if the only one fails.
DNS HealthEmail SecurityDKIM Record Not FoundA domain without a DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) record, which helps prevent email spoofing.
DNS HealthEmail SecurityDMARC Record Not FoundA domain without a Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) policy.
DNS HealthEmail SecurityMail Server PTR MismatchA mail server whose reverse DNS (PTR) record does not match its address, which can hurt email delivery.
DNS HealthEmail SecurityMail Server PTR Not ConfiguredA mail server with no reverse DNS (PTR) record, which can hurt email reputation and delivery.
DNS HealthEmail SecuritySPF Record contains a SoftfailA Sender Policy Framework (SPF) record that ends in softfail, which may not stop spoofed email.
DNS HealthEmail SecuritySPF Record Contains WildcardAn SPF record with a wildcard, which may let unauthorised servers send email for the domain.
DNS HealthEmail SecuritySPF Record Not FoundA domain without an SPF record, which helps stop unauthorised senders spoofing it.
Network SecurityExposed Internal IP NetworkInternal IP Address/Range ExposedInternal IP addresses or ranges exposed publicly, which can reveal the network's layout.
Network SecurityInsecure ProtocolsSSH Server Supports Vulnerable ProtocolAn SSH server running an outdated protocol version with known weaknesses.
Network SecurityInsecure ProtocolsSSH Server Supports Weak CipherAn SSH server that offers weak encryption ciphers.
Network SecurityInsecure ProtocolsSSH Server Supports Weak MAC AlgorithmAn SSH server that offers weak message authentication code (MAC) algorithms.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceDNS Service Observed (53)A DNS server reachable from the internet, which may be open to amplification attacks or zone transfers.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceIMAP Service Observed (143, 993)An IMAP email service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceOpenVPN Service Observed (1194)An OpenVPN service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceOther Potentially Insecure PortsServices exposed on other ports that are commonly insecure.
Network SecurityInsecure ServicePOP3 Service Observed (110, 995)A POP3 email service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServicePPTP Service Observed (1723)A PPTP VPN service, which uses a deprecated, insecure protocol.
Network SecurityInsecure ServicePulse Connect Secure VPN Product Observed (6514)A Pulse Connect Secure VPN product reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceRsync Service Observed (873)An rsync service reachable from the internet, which can allow unauthorised file access or data exfiltration.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceSMB Service Observed (139, 445)A Server Message Block (SMB) file-sharing service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceSOAP Server ObservedA SOAP web service reachable from the internet, which may need access controls.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceTelnet Service Observed (23)A Telnet service, which sends credentials in plain text.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceUPnP Service (1900)A Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceVNC Service Observed (5800, 5900)A Virtual Network Computing (VNC) remote desktop service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityInsecure ServiceVoIP Service Observed (5060)A Voice over IP (VoIP) service reachable from the internet.
Network SecurityRemote Access ServiceFTP Service Observed (21)An FTP service reachable from the internet, a possible route to unauthorised file access.
Network SecurityRemote Access ServiceRDP Service Observed (3389)A Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) service reachable from the internet, a common target for brute-force attacks.
Network SecurityRemote Access ServiceSSH Service Observed (22)An SSH service reachable from the internet, a possible entry point for unauthorised access.
Patching CadencePatching CadenceServer Vulnerabilities (Critical)Critical-severity vulnerabilities on the third party's servers, which need immediate remediation.
Patching CadencePatching CadenceServer Vulnerabilities (High)High-severity vulnerabilities on the third party's servers, which need prompt remediation.
Patching CadencePatching CadenceServer Vulnerabilities (Low)Low-severity vulnerabilities on the third party's servers, to fix in regular patching.
Patching CadencePatching CadenceServer Vulnerabilities (Medium)Medium-severity vulnerabilities on the third party's servers, to fix in regular patching.
  1. What is the Digital Risk Score, and why does it matter?
    It measures a third party's external exposure to cyber threats on a scale of 0 to 1000, where 0 is best and 1000 is worst. It shows which third parties carry the most risk and where remediation would help most.

  2. How is the score calculated?
    Each indicator is graded A to F by comparing its number of findings with thresholds set for that indicator. The grade, scaled by the indicator's severity, gives the points the indicator contributes. Indicator points are added up per category, and each category is capped at its weight. The capped category totals are added up and scaled to 0 to 1000. Finally, the total is adjusted for the size of the attack surface: an organisation with more than 250 live hosts has its score scaled down so that a larger attack surface is not unfairly penalised. See Risk Score Card.

  3. What does a high or low score mean?
    A higher score means more serious security issues that need attention. A lower score means fewer issues and less external exposure. Scores are rated "Low" below 200, "Medium" from 200 to 399, "High" from 400 to 749, and "Very High" from 750.

  4. How often is the score updated?
    StyxView recalculates the score every day as new findings arrive and asset exposure changes. Use "Select Date" to see an earlier day's score.

  5. Which categories contribute most to the score?
    "Network Security" and "Patching Cadence" carry the most weight, 20% each. "Asset Reputation", "Certificates", "Data Leakage", and "Database and Directory Exposure" carry 10% each. "Application Security", "Brand Risks", "Disclosures", and "DNS Health" carry 5% each. See Risk Score Overview.

  6. Which assets are included?
    Internet-facing assets discovered for the organisation, such as domains, hosts, IP addresses, TLS/SSL certificates, DNS and email records, and exposed services and databases. Data leakage and brand risks found about the organisation are included too.

  7. How does a third party's list differ from my organisation's Risk Indicator List?
    A third party's score is calculated the same way as a Company Protection score. Its list does not show these indicators: "Compromised Credit Card", "Data Breach", "Exposed Cloud Storage", "Exposed Code Repo", "LDAP Service Observed", "Industrial Control System Device Accessible", "Social Media Impersonation", "Social Media Impersonation (unverified)", "Unauthorized Job Posting (unverified)", "Rogue Mobile App (unverified)", "Negative News Sentiment", and "Negative Social Sentiment".

  8. How are grades assigned?
    Each indicator has its own thresholds. Its grade, from A (clean) to F (worst), depends on how many findings it has against those thresholds.

  9. Can the score help with compliance or audit readiness?
    Yes. The score, its history, and the reports built from it give documented evidence of continuous monitoring and remediation.

  10. Where can I view the score and its findings?
    Select Third Party Risk → a third party → Risk Score. The tabs are "Overview", "Risk Score Card", "Risk Indicator List", and "Historic Risk Score". Select a row in this list to open the findings behind an indicator.

Use the "Historic Risk Score" tab to see how the score moved between scoring runs and which indicators moved it. The tab needs at least two runs.

The "Historic Risk Score" tab, with the "Overall risk score over time" chart and the "From" and "To" run pickers.

  1. Look at the "Overall risk score over time" chart, which shows the runs of the last 30 days.

  2. Choose the two runs to compare: select them under "From" and "To", or drag across the chart. "From" must be earlier than "To".

  3. Read "What changed between these runs". It shows the overall score of both runs, then each category and indicator whose grade, findings, or score changed.

    The "What changed between these runs" panel, with the score of both runs and each category and indicator that changed.

  4. Select an indicator to expand it. "Increased" counts the findings that entered it between the two runs, and "Decreased" the findings that left it, by status. Select a status, or the filter icon beside it, to open those findings on the Findings page in a new tab.

A score can change because findings were remediated, because new findings were detected, or because new intelligence arrived about assets that were already monitored. The indicator breakdown shows which.